<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Godwin&#8217;s Law and the Debate about Sheikh Taj</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austrolabe.com/2007/01/15/godwins-law-and-the-debate-about-sheikh-taj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/01/15/godwins-law-and-the-debate-about-sheikh-taj/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shadower</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/01/15/godwins-law-and-the-debate-about-sheikh-taj/comment-page-1/#comment-5081</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/01/15/godwins-law-and-the-debate-about-sheikh-taj/#comment-5081</guid>
		<description>The irony in Haset Sali&#039;s comments as pointed out by Astrolabe is that AFIC appointed him to begin with ... 

Was a good laugh though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony in Haset Sali&#8217;s comments as pointed out by Astrolabe is that AFIC appointed him to begin with &#8230; </p>
<p>Was a good laugh though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Campion</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/01/15/godwins-law-and-the-debate-about-sheikh-taj/comment-page-1/#comment-5010</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Campion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 06:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/01/15/godwins-law-and-the-debate-about-sheikh-taj/#comment-5010</guid>
		<description>Heard&#039;s article is excellent, but I believe that the  Taj/Hitler comment was responsible for breaking the ice on the whole issue.

Taj needed to have someone stand up to him and say &quot;I&#039;m as silly as you, mate&quot;. Whether by design or not, I think that the Taj issue is now lanced.

All he needs to do now is make some more batshit insane remarks (which will raise a good-natured laugh from mainstream Australia) or say &quot;Derr, on ya&quot; to Haset Sali and we&#039;ll all proclaim him a normal Aussie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard&#8217;s article is excellent, but I believe that the  Taj/Hitler comment was responsible for breaking the ice on the whole issue.</p>
<p>Taj needed to have someone stand up to him and say &#8220;I&#8217;m as silly as you, mate&#8221;. Whether by design or not, I think that the Taj issue is now lanced.</p>
<p>All he needs to do now is make some more batshit insane remarks (which will raise a good-natured laugh from mainstream Australia) or say &#8220;Derr, on ya&#8221; to Haset Sali and we&#8217;ll all proclaim him a normal Aussie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
