<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom of the Press in the Muslim World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austrolabe.com/2007/02/06/freedom-of-the-press-in-the-muslim-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/02/06/freedom-of-the-press-in-the-muslim-world/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hood</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/02/06/freedom-of-the-press-in-the-muslim-world/comment-page-1/#comment-7454</link>
		<dc:creator>Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/02/06/freedom-of-the-press-in-the-muslim-world/#comment-7454</guid>
		<description>I would imagine the question would be related to Hisbah, and the role that Hisbah plays in curbing abuses by the state. If that&#039;s the case, then there would definitely need to be a free press. Sensationalism and quack-journalism though kind of defeat the purpose and tend to rile of the masses against the government, instead of inviting discourse and debate as to the Gov&#039;t&#039;s policies. That would mean the the Gov&#039;t would have to allow debate, but they don&#039;t because you need a free press to voice it, which ...etc etc ... you get the point :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine the question would be related to Hisbah, and the role that Hisbah plays in curbing abuses by the state. If that&#8217;s the case, then there would definitely need to be a free press. Sensationalism and quack-journalism though kind of defeat the purpose and tend to rile of the masses against the government, instead of inviting discourse and debate as to the Gov&#8217;t&#8217;s policies. That would mean the the Gov&#8217;t would have to allow debate, but they don&#8217;t because you need a free press to voice it, which &#8230;etc etc &#8230; you get the point <img src='http://austrolabe.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

