Paul Johnson, the British polymath and author, is one of my favourite writers and Intellectuals is one of his most fascinating books. I had reason to revisit it today and the opening paragraphs caught my attention:
OVER the past two hundred years the influence of intellectuals has grown steadily. Indeed, the rise of the secular intellectual has been a key factor in shaping the modern world. Seen against the long perspective of history it is in many ways a new phenomenon. It is true that in their earlier incarnations as priests, scribes and soothsayers, intellectuals have laid claim to guide society from the very beginning. But as guardians of hieratic cultures, whether primitive or sophisticated, their moral and ideological innovations were limited by the canons of external authority and by the inheritance of tradition. They were not, and could not be, free spirits, adventurers of the mind.
With the decline of clerical power in the eighteenth century, a new kind of mentor emerged to fill the vacuum and capture the ear of society. The secular intellectual might be deist, sceptic or atheist. But he was just as ready as any pontiff or presbyter to tell mankind how to conduct its affairs. He proclaimed, from the start, a special devotion to the interests of humanity and an evangelical duty to advance them by his teaching. He brought to this self-appointed task a far more radical approach than his clerical predecessors. He felt himself bound by no corpus of revealed religion. The collective wisdom of the past, the legacy of tradition, the prescriptive codes of ancestral experience existed to be selectively followed or wholly rejected entirely as his own good sense might decide. For the first time in human history, and with growing confidence and audacity, men arose to assert that they could diagnose the ills of society and cure them with their own unaided intellects: more, that they could devise formulae whereby not merely the structure of society but the fundamental habits of human beings could be transformed for the better. Unlike their sacerdotal predecessors, they were not servants and interpreters of the gods but substitutes. Their hero was Prometheus, who stole the celestial fire and brought it to earth.
3 comments ↓
Is he the same holy joe who has paid hookers to whip his bare arse?
Just another poser wearing a religous mask.
I’m not sure, Liam. I vaguely recall something along those lines though I think it was actually an award-winning British author (female) rather than a paid hooker.
Anyway, even if it was found to be true, I’m not sure that it refutes his observation that one of the consequences of the Enlightenment was that the cleric surrendered his role as moral guide of society to the secular intellectual(s). Whether or not one thinks that is a good thing is, of course, a matter for further discussion.
Interesting points- the Enlightenment actually ‘misread’ the Prometheus myth, though. In Aeschylus’ rendering, Zeus is actually the ‘New Prince’, and Prometheus embodies the ancien regime.
Leave a Comment