<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Secularisation Thesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/06/the-secularisation-thesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/06/the-secularisation-thesis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cinna</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/06/the-secularisation-thesis/comment-page-1/#comment-29881</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/06/the-secularisation-thesis/#comment-29881</guid>
		<description>What are Berger&#039;s sources for these claims? http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html suggests that it isn&#039;t true of hard scientists and this http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/050811_scientists_god.html
seems to suggest that he is mistaken about human scientists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are Berger&#8217;s sources for these claims? <a href="http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html">http://www.stephenjaygould.org.....le002.html</a> suggests that it isn&#8217;t true of hard scientists and this <a href="http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/050811_scientists_god.html">http://www.livescience.com/str.....s_god.html</a><br />
seems to suggest that he is mistaken about human scientists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

