<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When The Moors ruled Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Step in Time Tours</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-71770</link>
		<dc:creator>Step in Time Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-71770</guid>
		<description>Firstly to begin with the words of Horothswitha the Saxon Princess and Poet who visited Cordoba in the eleventh century. She said Cordoba was the Ornament of the World, please read &quot;The Ornament of the World&quot; by Menocal. 

Moorish Spain clearly was one of the reasons why the Western hemesphere became more civilised than it had been before the 15th Century. which is directly connected to print and the proliferation of paper by the Muslims this is why the average house in Andalusia especially in Cordoba had more books in it than the whole of Europe in the eleventh century.

Furthermore if it wasn&#039;t for the introduction of paper into Europe which was the reason why books became more available over parchment the Reformation and the Humanist movement would not have got anywhere it was through print that Martin Luther was able to propogate his attack on the Catholic Church. 

Indeed Andalusia was a place that was concord by all the great civilisations that is the Romans, Greeks ... etc but what no-one can deny is the effect of the Muslims on the Iberian Peninsula and the World indeed its 900 years of presence is the reason why its monuments can be visited today like the Alhambra Palace a unique building, and the Cordoba Mosque. We can say much more about this but it would take a book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly to begin with the words of Horothswitha the Saxon Princess and Poet who visited Cordoba in the eleventh century. She said Cordoba was the Ornament of the World, please read &#8220;The Ornament of the World&#8221; by Menocal. </p>
<p>Moorish Spain clearly was one of the reasons why the Western hemesphere became more civilised than it had been before the 15th Century. which is directly connected to print and the proliferation of paper by the Muslims this is why the average house in Andalusia especially in Cordoba had more books in it than the whole of Europe in the eleventh century.</p>
<p>Furthermore if it wasn&#8217;t for the introduction of paper into Europe which was the reason why books became more available over parchment the Reformation and the Humanist movement would not have got anywhere it was through print that Martin Luther was able to propogate his attack on the Catholic Church. </p>
<p>Indeed Andalusia was a place that was concord by all the great civilisations that is the Romans, Greeks &#8230; etc but what no-one can deny is the effect of the Muslims on the Iberian Peninsula and the World indeed its 900 years of presence is the reason why its monuments can be visited today like the Alhambra Palace a unique building, and the Cordoba Mosque. We can say much more about this but it would take a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hamilton Morgan</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-36352</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hamilton Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-36352</guid>
		<description>Though somebody noted my book, go have a look ... via www.losthistoryonline.com ... the book is lost history: the enduring legacy of muslim scientists, thinkers and artists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though somebody noted my book, go have a look &#8230; via <a href="http://www.losthistoryonline.com">www.losthistoryonline.com</a> &#8230; the book is lost history: the enduring legacy of muslim scientists, thinkers and artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33223</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33223</guid>
		<description>To echo Cinna&#039;s last point: it was only after Grenada was virtually gone that the Inquisition was set up. Before that strict religious orthodoxy, as interpreted by the Roman Catholic church of the time, was not required. It is perhaps not surprising that Spain was at its most powerful and expansionist when it was relatively tolerant and became less tolerant as it became less powerful - or vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To echo Cinna&#8217;s last point: it was only after Grenada was virtually gone that the Inquisition was set up. Before that strict religious orthodoxy, as interpreted by the Roman Catholic church of the time, was not required. It is perhaps not surprising that Spain was at its most powerful and expansionist when it was relatively tolerant and became less tolerant as it became less powerful &#8211; or vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinna</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33193</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33193</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Orthodox history/myth of Moorish Spain is that Islam was a foreign, despotic rule imposed on the poor Christians who after 700 years threw off the Muslim yolk finally liberating Hispana from the evil interlopers. &quot;

No, James, that&#039;s the Catholic history/myth. The orthodox history/myth in English-speaking countries, derived from Washington Irving and others, is that for seven hundred years muslim Spain was an astonishingly tolerant and civilised place far in advance of the rest of Europe that for some mysterious reason was overthrown by barbarous and intolerant Spaniards who didn&#039;t want to be ruled in a tolerant or civilised way. 
In fact, the ummayad dynasty- the &quot;golden age of islamic Spain&quot;- fell in the early eleventh century and the next four centuries weren&#039;t quite so golden for anyone.  It&#039;s a myth that ignores the ta&#039;ifas and the activities of the almoravids and the almohads who were imported from Morocco as allies in the fight against christian statelets and who each usurped power in their turn. The division between arab and berber existed- still exists- in North Africa and affected politics and warfare there and in Spain- both the almoravids and the almohads were Berber by origin. 
You could say that &quot;In the high middle ages Islam was the more cultured and more civilized governance.&quot;. It would be more accurate to say it was the less uncultured and less uncivilised in fact, and only at its best at that. Cerainly the almohads were so unpleasant as rulers that many muslims preferred rule by christian states. However, as I said, at that time Spanish christians were also comparatively tolerant religiously for entirely pragmatic reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Orthodox history/myth of Moorish Spain is that Islam was a foreign, despotic rule imposed on the poor Christians who after 700 years threw off the Muslim yolk finally liberating Hispana from the evil interlopers. &#8221;</p>
<p>No, James, that&#8217;s the Catholic history/myth. The orthodox history/myth in English-speaking countries, derived from Washington Irving and others, is that for seven hundred years muslim Spain was an astonishingly tolerant and civilised place far in advance of the rest of Europe that for some mysterious reason was overthrown by barbarous and intolerant Spaniards who didn&#8217;t want to be ruled in a tolerant or civilised way.<br />
In fact, the ummayad dynasty- the &#8220;golden age of islamic Spain&#8221;- fell in the early eleventh century and the next four centuries weren&#8217;t quite so golden for anyone.  It&#8217;s a myth that ignores the ta&#8217;ifas and the activities of the almoravids and the almohads who were imported from Morocco as allies in the fight against christian statelets and who each usurped power in their turn. The division between arab and berber existed- still exists- in North Africa and affected politics and warfare there and in Spain- both the almoravids and the almohads were Berber by origin.<br />
You could say that &#8220;In the high middle ages Islam was the more cultured and more civilized governance.&#8221;. It would be more accurate to say it was the less uncultured and less uncivilised in fact, and only at its best at that. Cerainly the almohads were so unpleasant as rulers that many muslims preferred rule by christian states. However, as I said, at that time Spanish christians were also comparatively tolerant religiously for entirely pragmatic reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33095</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33095</guid>
		<description>Cinna,

We will have to wait for the full election results on that won&#039;t we? Richard Fletcher has a study, that is a beginning isn&#039;t it?  Having not seen the study or the statistics all I can add is &quot;meh.&quot;

Statistical studies can shed light or they can add confusion on a subject. There is a great book that has been out for ages called &quot;how to lie with statistics&quot; 

 Now maybe this study by Mr. Fletcher is solid research or maybe there are some flaws that didn&#039;t catch his eye.  Foolishly believing in the innate goodness of all humans, I&#039;ll give Mr. Fletcher the benefit of the doubt and assume that this was serious research and not a hatchet job.

The Orthodox history/myth of Moorish Spain is that Islam was a foreign, despotic rule imposed on the poor Christians who after 700 years threw off the Muslim yolk finally liberating Hispana from the evil interlopers.  

The revisionist history may give overemphasis to the notion that Islam actually was deeply ingrained into the lives of the people of Andalus, that might be a good point.  But the revisionist history is offering new Thesis.

Don&#039;t want to get too Hegelian here but sometimes the writing of history does follow the pattern of Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis. 

Understanding the difference between Muslim rule and Islam is important.  I seriously doubt there is anything in the Holy Quaran nor the Hadiths that lead the Umyyads to use Mercenaries to protect their rule. 

But this was not an uncommon arrangement in the 8th Century.  Mercenary armies were used right up to the French Revolution.   Mercenary armies are always messy and  if you don&#039;t pay them they can get quite nasty.  As they are in for the pay only, they can and are riven by class, race, ethnic and sometimes religious differences. History is full of dynastic collapses brought about by disgruntled mercenary soldiers who turn on their employer when the gold ran out. 

It is a very subjective business of figuring out witch band of brigands was &quot;the worst.&quot;  The Islamic Brigands? The Christian Brigands? Hard to say without a program to figure out who all the players are.  Hard to say which team they are on at any given time.

The overarching idea though is not so hard.  In the high middle ages Islam was the more cultured and more civilized governance.  For the times, Islam was light-years ahead of Christendom. For every jihad of the Muslims there seems to be 10 or so Crusades or some other form of nastiness perpetrated by the Latins.  Remember it was the Latin Crusaders that sacked Constantinople and laid low the Byzantine Empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cinna,</p>
<p>We will have to wait for the full election results on that won&#8217;t we? Richard Fletcher has a study, that is a beginning isn&#8217;t it?  Having not seen the study or the statistics all I can add is &#8220;meh.&#8221;</p>
<p>Statistical studies can shed light or they can add confusion on a subject. There is a great book that has been out for ages called &#8220;how to lie with statistics&#8221; </p>
<p> Now maybe this study by Mr. Fletcher is solid research or maybe there are some flaws that didn&#8217;t catch his eye.  Foolishly believing in the innate goodness of all humans, I&#8217;ll give Mr. Fletcher the benefit of the doubt and assume that this was serious research and not a hatchet job.</p>
<p>The Orthodox history/myth of Moorish Spain is that Islam was a foreign, despotic rule imposed on the poor Christians who after 700 years threw off the Muslim yolk finally liberating Hispana from the evil interlopers.  </p>
<p>The revisionist history may give overemphasis to the notion that Islam actually was deeply ingrained into the lives of the people of Andalus, that might be a good point.  But the revisionist history is offering new Thesis.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t want to get too Hegelian here but sometimes the writing of history does follow the pattern of Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis. </p>
<p>Understanding the difference between Muslim rule and Islam is important.  I seriously doubt there is anything in the Holy Quaran nor the Hadiths that lead the Umyyads to use Mercenaries to protect their rule. </p>
<p>But this was not an uncommon arrangement in the 8th Century.  Mercenary armies were used right up to the French Revolution.   Mercenary armies are always messy and  if you don&#8217;t pay them they can get quite nasty.  As they are in for the pay only, they can and are riven by class, race, ethnic and sometimes religious differences. History is full of dynastic collapses brought about by disgruntled mercenary soldiers who turn on their employer when the gold ran out. </p>
<p>It is a very subjective business of figuring out witch band of brigands was &#8220;the worst.&#8221;  The Islamic Brigands? The Christian Brigands? Hard to say without a program to figure out who all the players are.  Hard to say which team they are on at any given time.</p>
<p>The overarching idea though is not so hard.  In the high middle ages Islam was the more cultured and more civilized governance.  For the times, Islam was light-years ahead of Christendom. For every jihad of the Muslims there seems to be 10 or so Crusades or some other form of nastiness perpetrated by the Latins.  Remember it was the Latin Crusaders that sacked Constantinople and laid low the Byzantine Empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billah</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33033</link>
		<dc:creator>billah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33033</guid>
		<description>Wow! While this site can sometimes be infuriating, it is generally such a boon to Muslims and the wider community. What a beautiful discussion, above. I did not see the programme, but I am enjoying reading all of you, in comments, very much. Thank you. I have looked, but I have not found an equivalent site anywhere else.

I know it&#039;s slightly off topic (apologies), but i particularly regret the absence of such a site for women. There are the blogs that range from disaffected Saudi girls, to the ultra religious politcal moderates in Canada, and the once delightfully subvrsive personal blog of a young Tunisian woman living in the US. But I haven&#039;t yet found the same callibre of political discussion that exists here in a comparable site run by a woman or women. I wonder if there are such women in Australia (politically astute and moderate) with an online presence. I am particularly interested inthose with a background out of Dar el-Islam, as opposed to converts. Not that I have anything against converts, it&#039;s just that the life experiences differ so greatly.

 If anyone knows of anything I should check out, please alert me.

Sorry for the ramble.

Back to Andalus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! While this site can sometimes be infuriating, it is generally such a boon to Muslims and the wider community. What a beautiful discussion, above. I did not see the programme, but I am enjoying reading all of you, in comments, very much. Thank you. I have looked, but I have not found an equivalent site anywhere else.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s slightly off topic (apologies), but i particularly regret the absence of such a site for women. There are the blogs that range from disaffected Saudi girls, to the ultra religious politcal moderates in Canada, and the once delightfully subvrsive personal blog of a young Tunisian woman living in the US. But I haven&#8217;t yet found the same callibre of political discussion that exists here in a comparable site run by a woman or women. I wonder if there are such women in Australia (politically astute and moderate) with an online presence. I am particularly interested inthose with a background out of Dar el-Islam, as opposed to converts. Not that I have anything against converts, it&#8217;s just that the life experiences differ so greatly.</p>
<p> If anyone knows of anything I should check out, please alert me.</p>
<p>Sorry for the ramble.</p>
<p>Back to Andalus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinna</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33028</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33028</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between  muslim and muslim-ruled, James. According to Richard Fletcher in Moorish Spain there came a point in the ninth century AD when conversion to islam became less common than one would expect statistically if a conquest was accepted. There even seems to have been a deliberate poloicy of provoking christian martyrdom [see the martyrs of Toledo] to discourage it. Furthermore, the muslims depended on reinfocement form Morocco and the christians from elsewhere in Europe in their fights with one another, and the internal problems, both between Spanish muslims and Moroccan and between  berbers and arabs and spanish muslims, seem to have been much more disruptive than those between christian statelets and their immigrant fighters. 
Islam is probably less inherently intolerant than christianity, but conditions in mediaeval Spain encouraged toleration for purely practical reasons. It was only after Spain was entirely ruled by one christian state that religious persecution really began.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between  muslim and muslim-ruled, James. According to Richard Fletcher in Moorish Spain there came a point in the ninth century AD when conversion to islam became less common than one would expect statistically if a conquest was accepted. There even seems to have been a deliberate poloicy of provoking christian martyrdom [see the martyrs of Toledo] to discourage it. Furthermore, the muslims depended on reinfocement form Morocco and the christians from elsewhere in Europe in their fights with one another, and the internal problems, both between Spanish muslims and Moroccan and between  berbers and arabs and spanish muslims, seem to have been much more disruptive than those between christian statelets and their immigrant fighters.<br />
Islam is probably less inherently intolerant than christianity, but conditions in mediaeval Spain encouraged toleration for purely practical reasons. It was only after Spain was entirely ruled by one christian state that religious persecution really began.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33026</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33026</guid>
		<description>Amir,
 That is the fun of history, the story behind the story.  Peel back the myth and the facts are almost always more interesting.
What was interesting and what I always suspected was that the conquest of Spain was a lot less violent than advertised.  The Visigothic kingdoms in Spain were the true interlopers.  When the Islamic armies arrived many of the populace were more than glad to see the back of their soon to be former rulers.  Read the history of the &quot;Dark Ages&quot; the Visigoths were a Germanic people in conflict with their Latin subjects.  They believed in a &quot;heretical&quot; form of Christianity known as Arianism.  The land was broken in to numerous tiny squabbling states run by robber-baron aristocracy.  The culture , state and religion were seriously broken.
Into this failed state rode the Islamic armies. Islam was still young and filled with fire. Islam was dynamic, curious, adventurous and committed. It offered a clear message and a clear faith. It offered something that had been missing for long time-stability. Only two things put a halt to Islams&#039; advance; The Pyrenees and Charles Martel. 

Looking back, one wonders about how Islam made such inroads into &quot;Christian&quot; Spain. In the High Middle ages, most of Andalusia was Muslim.  A great deal of ink has been spilled over how this was an effect of taxation. Leave it to our material view of the world to put this explanation front and center.  But I wonder how many people converted to Islam because they were tired of being oppressed for being the &quot;wrong&quot; type of Christians.

In the high middle ages the Muslims were much more relaxed about religious matters than the Christians.  If you doubt that Wiki the &quot;Albigensian Crusade.&quot; I wonder how many people in medieval  Hispania decided to give Christianity a miss and join the more rational religion of the time, Islam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amir,<br />
 That is the fun of history, the story behind the story.  Peel back the myth and the facts are almost always more interesting.<br />
What was interesting and what I always suspected was that the conquest of Spain was a lot less violent than advertised.  The Visigothic kingdoms in Spain were the true interlopers.  When the Islamic armies arrived many of the populace were more than glad to see the back of their soon to be former rulers.  Read the history of the &#8220;Dark Ages&#8221; the Visigoths were a Germanic people in conflict with their Latin subjects.  They believed in a &#8220;heretical&#8221; form of Christianity known as Arianism.  The land was broken in to numerous tiny squabbling states run by robber-baron aristocracy.  The culture , state and religion were seriously broken.<br />
Into this failed state rode the Islamic armies. Islam was still young and filled with fire. Islam was dynamic, curious, adventurous and committed. It offered a clear message and a clear faith. It offered something that had been missing for long time-stability. Only two things put a halt to Islams&#8217; advance; The Pyrenees and Charles Martel. </p>
<p>Looking back, one wonders about how Islam made such inroads into &#8220;Christian&#8221; Spain. In the High Middle ages, most of Andalusia was Muslim.  A great deal of ink has been spilled over how this was an effect of taxation. Leave it to our material view of the world to put this explanation front and center.  But I wonder how many people converted to Islam because they were tired of being oppressed for being the &#8220;wrong&#8221; type of Christians.</p>
<p>In the high middle ages the Muslims were much more relaxed about religious matters than the Christians.  If you doubt that Wiki the &#8220;Albigensian Crusade.&#8221; I wonder how many people in medieval  Hispania decided to give Christianity a miss and join the more rational religion of the time, Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawood</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-33017</link>
		<dc:creator>dawood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-33017</guid>
		<description>There is a great book called &quot;The Fall of the Caliphate of Cordoba: Berbers and Andalusis in Conflict&quot; which discusses the fragmentation of the Umayyad caliphate in to townships and city-states. It is very interesting reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great book called &#8220;The Fall of the Caliphate of Cordoba: Berbers and Andalusis in Conflict&#8221; which discusses the fragmentation of the Umayyad caliphate in to townships and city-states. It is very interesting reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-32978</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2007/06/24/when-the-moors-ruled-europe/#comment-32978</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments, James.

One thing that I was surprised to learn from this documentary and reading about the period is that the so-called Fall of Andalusia more resembled a civil war than a simple case of Muslim versus Christian.  For example, there were Christian rulers aligning themselves with Muslims (and vice versa) and people such as the famous &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.monstersandcritics.com/europe/features/article_1315783.php/Row_erupts_in_Spain_over_legendary_knight_El_Cids_sword&quot;&gt;El Cid&lt;/a&gt; who were more or less mercenaries selling their services to rulers of any faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, James.</p>
<p>One thing that I was surprised to learn from this documentary and reading about the period is that the so-called Fall of Andalusia more resembled a civil war than a simple case of Muslim versus Christian.  For example, there were Christian rulers aligning themselves with Muslims (and vice versa) and people such as the famous <a href="http://news.monstersandcritics.com/europe/features/article_1315783.php/Row_erupts_in_Spain_over_legendary_knight_El_Cids_sword">El Cid</a> who were more or less mercenaries selling their services to rulers of any faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
