Comments on: Harun Yahya: Jews, Jews, Masons, Jews

By: sean

sean — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:11:41 +0000

“The Young Turks’ actions- whatever they were- were over a hundred years after the French Revolution, so they certainly weren’t directly inspired by it. That’s apart from the fact that they weren’t jewish.”

Actually a large number of the Young Turks were descendents of Shabbatai Zvi followers who fused Judaism and Islam.

Yahya is an utter twat and it beggars belief that anyone can take him seriously. American evangelists love the guy. Need I say more?

By: svend

svend — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:58:00 +0000

Harun Yahya is a bigot, hack and fraud. The lack of objectivity, rigor and simple intelligence leap off every page of his tracts.

The depressing thing is how strongly his schlock evidently appeals to the masses in Muslim societies.

Simplistic ideas and conspiracy theories sell everywhere. Just look at all the fevered crap being shoveled about Islam in American bookstores these days.

By: Adrien

Adrien — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:48:56 +0000

Why is it that you label this author an “anti-semitic crank” because he raises his concerns regarding people who happen to be of the Jewish faith?

In those quotes on display he doesn’t say that Judaism is evil, or Jews are bad because they’re Jews. So which part of the text makes him anti semite?

One could say the same about the various anti-Muslim rants being fired about the place. They don’t actually say Islam is evil or that Muslims are bad, but…..

And the Marquis de Sade was Jewish? Come on.

By: Cinna

Cinna — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:49:19 +0000

Harun Yahya’s claims about freemasons and jews aren’t nothing but bullshit.
They’re lies.

By: truthseeker

truthseeker — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:31:15 +0000

Just because Harun Yahya was talking and presenting Islam as a solution to all the problems everybody is keen to write off him with such nonsense. It’s just the thing you don’t like means it’s nothing but bullshit. Right?!

By: touchstone

touchstone — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:20:47 +0000

I tried to read one of Yahya’s books a few weeks ago, and I couldnt get past the first page. It was honestly no more than a vomit-inducing rant, with no objectivity whatsoever.

By: Cinna

Cinna — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:54:54 +0000

The Young Turks’ actions- whatever they were- were over a hundred years after the French Revolution, so they certainly weren’t directly inspired by it. That’s apart from the fact that they weren’t jewish.

By: Saifuddin

Saifuddin — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:21:01 +0000

BismillaharRahmanirRahim

as-salaamu ‘alaikum. The Young Turks actions in the aftermath of the French Revolution is not a “theory”, this is history.

-Saifuddin

By: Bill Warren

Bill Warren — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:52:18 +0000

Most of the Enlightenment and Rationalist figures
mentioned could have been Masons but definitely not Jews.
I am trying to refind the name the authoress of a French language
antisemitic attack on De Sade. She is something of a
Celtomaniac and while not ruling out possible Jewish
ancestry she tries to attribute a Semitic race psychology to De Sade based on alleged Moorish
nobility among his ancestors in Savoy.

By: David

David — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:36:09 +0000

Yahya says they were atheists (so they didn’t even believe in Judaism according to him), and they tried to turn people away from religion. Therefore, when he points out they were Jewish he is describing their race not their religion. How on earth can anyone say that this isn’t racist?

Yahya is mentioning their race because he believes that their trickery and wickedness was partly due to them having Jewish blood pumping through their veins. That’s textbook antisemitism.