Comments on: Haneef lawyer to speak at HT rally

By: muslim_perth

muslim_perth — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:17:54 +0000

there is nothing wrong with HT organising a rally in support of dr haneef……. any one of us could become the next ‘haneef’…..

i havent heard of any other muslim organistraion getting off their backsides and organisng anything in this saga…….. hats off to HT…….

By: Andrew Landeryou

Andrew Landeryou — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:48:26 +0000

Impressive that he could be so stupid, yes.

By: Omar

Omar — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:06:31 +0000

Wow- that’s pretty harsh. Banned, just for insinuating that Austrolabe was asking a leading question.

By: David

David — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:27:39 +0000

The former PM Malcolm Fraser is also addressing the rally! That’s pretty impressive..

By: Amir

Amir — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:38:18 +0000

The lawyer Peter Russo and Haneef’s cousin won’t be speaking there. I understand they have cancelled.

By: Olisyah

Olisyah — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:37:50 +0000

T-Cell – Before you continue your predictable slander, apparently Peter Russo has this evening informed the organisers that current developments will now preclude him and Imran from making themselves available in Sydney on Sunday.

Also, I don’t think its particularly helpful to individualise this case. Dr Haneef is not the first, and certainly not the last, to live the consequences of the multi-facted war on terror. That rally on Sunday transcends both Hizb ut-Tahrir and Dr Haneef. Jzk.

By: T Cell

T Cell — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:20:08 +0000

Its insane, its the one move that could destroy public support for Haneef.

I also wonder at the quality of his legal counsel if they can’t work out who HT are, and that they need to stay clear of them

By: null

null — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:04:59 +0000

Does anyone else get the vibe that this is an idea of the non-good variety?

By: muslim_perth

muslim_perth — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:28:28 +0000

his lawyers participation should not in anyway affect dr haneefs case….

By: Omar

Omar — Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:07:39 +0000

Bit of a leading question, isn’t it?