<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;100 years of war&#8221; candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:12:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Carty</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74655</link>
		<dc:creator>George Carty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74655</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t Hong Kong&#039;s success mainly the result of the fact that it served as an interface between Communist China and the outside world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t Hong Kong&#8217;s success mainly the result of the fact that it served as an interface between Communist China and the outside world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDsg</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74610</link>
		<dc:creator>JDsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying that &quot;unfettered capitalism&quot; can&#039;t produce some good.  I &lt;i&gt;am&lt;/i&gt; saying that capitalism unchecked can cause some significant problems; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23367033/&quot;&gt;just ask the people along the Han River&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying that &#8220;unfettered capitalism&#8221; can&#8217;t produce some good.  I <i>am</i> saying that capitalism unchecked can cause some significant problems; <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23367033/">just ask the people along the Han River</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74601</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74601</guid>
		<description>Hong Kong was a product of mostly &quot;unfettered capitalism&quot; (thanks to the efforts or rather non-efforts of John Cowperthwaite).  Cowperthwaite was such an advocate of &quot;unfettered capitalism&quot; that he didn&#039;t want the government to collect or produce economic statistics lest it become a stepping stone towards interventionism or government meddling in the market.   The results, as I&#039;m sure most would agree, were astounding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hong Kong was a product of mostly &#8220;unfettered capitalism&#8221; (thanks to the efforts or rather non-efforts of John Cowperthwaite).  Cowperthwaite was such an advocate of &#8220;unfettered capitalism&#8221; that he didn&#8217;t want the government to collect or produce economic statistics lest it become a stepping stone towards interventionism or government meddling in the market.   The results, as I&#8217;m sure most would agree, were astounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDsg</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74585</link>
		<dc:creator>JDsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74585</guid>
		<description>@ Eudaemonion:  &lt;i&gt;China might not be enforcing some of its regulations with the multinationals...&lt;/i&gt;

China&#039;s not enforcing its regulations among Chinese companies, let alone multinationals (which, the gov&#039;t, no doubt, watches a little more closely than the domestic firms).  The news reports of numerous problems within China leave no doubt of that.


&lt;i&gt;...but it means diddly squat when the government interferes with the very lifeblood of an economy; its currency.&lt;/i&gt;

All central banks &quot;interfere&quot; from time to time with their their own currencies (and sometimes that of another country&#039;s currency, usually at the request of that country&#039;s central bank).


&lt;i&gt;If you haven’t already noticed, the Chinese devalue their currency by pegging the Yuan to the US dollar.&lt;/i&gt;

You are, sadly, behind the times; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renminbi#Exchange_rate&quot;&gt;Yuan is tied to a basket of currencies&lt;/a&gt;, and has been for some time.

&lt;i&gt;This is the much vaunted ‘fiscal policy’ claptrap at work.&lt;/i&gt;

Learn the difference between fiscal policy and monetary policy.

@ KLM:  &lt;i&gt;The Chinese economy is still a managed economy.&lt;/i&gt;

To a degree, yes.  And a fair amount of their economy is still run by the gov&#039;t.  But with all the stories running rampant, on a near-weekly basis, of brick kiln slavery, of rivers running red from chemical pollution, of ships colliding near the mouth of the Pearl River due to the air pollution haze (to say nothing of the haze over Hong Kong that I see when I turn on CNN every morning), it doesn&#039;t take much to realize that China suffers from unfettered capitalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Eudaemonion:  <i>China might not be enforcing some of its regulations with the multinationals&#8230;</i></p>
<p>China&#8217;s not enforcing its regulations among Chinese companies, let alone multinationals (which, the gov&#8217;t, no doubt, watches a little more closely than the domestic firms).  The news reports of numerous problems within China leave no doubt of that.</p>
<p><i>&#8230;but it means diddly squat when the government interferes with the very lifeblood of an economy; its currency.</i></p>
<p>All central banks &#8220;interfere&#8221; from time to time with their their own currencies (and sometimes that of another country&#8217;s currency, usually at the request of that country&#8217;s central bank).</p>
<p><i>If you haven’t already noticed, the Chinese devalue their currency by pegging the Yuan to the US dollar.</i></p>
<p>You are, sadly, behind the times; the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renminbi#Exchange_rate">Yuan is tied to a basket of currencies</a>, and has been for some time.</p>
<p><i>This is the much vaunted ‘fiscal policy’ claptrap at work.</i></p>
<p>Learn the difference between fiscal policy and monetary policy.</p>
<p>@ KLM:  <i>The Chinese economy is still a managed economy.</i></p>
<p>To a degree, yes.  And a fair amount of their economy is still run by the gov&#8217;t.  But with all the stories running rampant, on a near-weekly basis, of brick kiln slavery, of rivers running red from chemical pollution, of ships colliding near the mouth of the Pearl River due to the air pollution haze (to say nothing of the haze over Hong Kong that I see when I turn on CNN every morning), it doesn&#8217;t take much to realize that China suffers from unfettered capitalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KLM</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74500</link>
		<dc:creator>KLM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74500</guid>
		<description>The Chinese economy is still a managed economy.  A third of it&#039;s GDP is from state-owned industry and they continue to own the &quot;commanding heights&quot; of the economy such as the energy companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese economy is still a managed economy.  A third of it&#8217;s GDP is from state-owned industry and they continue to own the &#8220;commanding heights&#8221; of the economy such as the energy companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eudaemonion</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74467</link>
		<dc:creator>Eudaemonion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74467</guid>
		<description>JDsg, without meaning to cause any offense, your previous comment had me rolling on the floor in fits of hysterical laughter. I am not sure where you pulled such a patently ridiculous idea from.

Listen, laisez faire economics is about the complete removal of unwarranted government force from all sectors of life that affect the economy. China might not be enforcing some of its regulations with the multinationals. That&#039;s all fine and dandy, but it means diddly squat when the government interferes with the very lifeblood of an economy; its currency. If you haven&#039;t already noticed, the Chinese devalue their currency by pegging the Yuan to the US dollar. 

This is the much vaunted &#039;fiscal policy&#039; claptrap at work. Were currency traded as any other commodity in China, it would not be so undervalued, as the demand for the Yuan would raise its value. But for &#039;Fiscal Policy&#039; of Beijing, there would not be such an artificially cheap Yuan, and no lopsided trade arrangements.

Would be good for the environment too. The better to pooh pooh those Statists who think only the Government can protect it, I guess.

* Is distortionary even a word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDsg, without meaning to cause any offense, your previous comment had me rolling on the floor in fits of hysterical laughter. I am not sure where you pulled such a patently ridiculous idea from.</p>
<p>Listen, laisez faire economics is about the complete removal of unwarranted government force from all sectors of life that affect the economy. China might not be enforcing some of its regulations with the multinationals. That&#8217;s all fine and dandy, but it means diddly squat when the government interferes with the very lifeblood of an economy; its currency. If you haven&#8217;t already noticed, the Chinese devalue their currency by pegging the Yuan to the US dollar. </p>
<p>This is the much vaunted &#8216;fiscal policy&#8217; claptrap at work. Were currency traded as any other commodity in China, it would not be so undervalued, as the demand for the Yuan would raise its value. But for &#8216;Fiscal Policy&#8217; of Beijing, there would not be such an artificially cheap Yuan, and no lopsided trade arrangements.</p>
<p>Would be good for the environment too. The better to pooh pooh those Statists who think only the Government can protect it, I guess.</p>
<p>* Is distortionary even a word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Omar</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74457</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74457</guid>
		<description>Steve Chapman of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/news/show/125338.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Reason&lt;/i&gt; magazine&lt;/a&gt; on John McCain&#039;s steadfast position on Iraq:&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain has been consistent about Iraq, in the sense of being consistently wrong. If the American people get a long look at what he&#039;s said and a clear picture of our fortunes in Iraq, he may yearn for the days when he was being pilloried for offering &quot;amnesty&quot; to illegal immigrants.McCain portrays himself as uniquely clear-eyed about the war. In fact, those eyes have often been full of stars. When Army Gen. Eric Shinseki forecast that more troops would be needed for the occupation, McCain didn&#039;t fret. Shortly before the invasion, he said, &quot;I have no qualms about our strategic plans.&quot; As the online magazine Salon reports, he predicted the war would be &quot;another chapter in the glorious history of the United States of America.&quot;

He brags now that he criticized Donald Rumsfeld&#039;s handling of the occupation. But McCain didn&#039;t declare &quot;no confidence&quot; in him until a year and a half after the invasion. And let&#039;s not forget the day he took a stroll through a Baghdad market, guarded by attack helicopters and 100 soldiers in full combat mode, to prove how safe Iraq was. The following day, 21 Iraqis were abducted from the market and murdered.

McCain&#039;s attempts to show off his expertise often turn into banana peels. Recently he attacked Barack Obama for saying that in the future, he might send forces back in &quot;if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq.&quot; Jeered the Arizona senator, &quot;Al-Qaida already has a base in Iraq. It&#039;s called al-Qaida in Iraq.&quot;

But al-Qaida in Iraq has about as much to do with al-Qaida in Afghanistan as the San Diego Padres have to do with the Catholic Church. It&#039;s a separate, independent and largely homegrown group that is focused on slaughtering Iraqi Shiites, not targeting American cities. And here&#039;s a newsflash for McCain: It didn&#039;t exist until our invasion created conditions favorable to violent insurgency.&lt;/blockquote&gt;So much for straight talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Chapman of <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/125338.html"><i>Reason</i> magazine</a> on John McCain&#8217;s steadfast position on Iraq:<br />
<blockquote>McCain has been consistent about Iraq, in the sense of being consistently wrong. If the American people get a long look at what he&#8217;s said and a clear picture of our fortunes in Iraq, he may yearn for the days when he was being pilloried for offering &#8220;amnesty&#8221; to illegal immigrants.McCain portrays himself as uniquely clear-eyed about the war. In fact, those eyes have often been full of stars. When Army Gen. Eric Shinseki forecast that more troops would be needed for the occupation, McCain didn&#8217;t fret. Shortly before the invasion, he said, &#8220;I have no qualms about our strategic plans.&#8221; As the online magazine Salon reports, he predicted the war would be &#8220;another chapter in the glorious history of the United States of America.&#8221;</p>
<p>He brags now that he criticized Donald Rumsfeld&#8217;s handling of the occupation. But McCain didn&#8217;t declare &#8220;no confidence&#8221; in him until a year and a half after the invasion. And let&#8217;s not forget the day he took a stroll through a Baghdad market, guarded by attack helicopters and 100 soldiers in full combat mode, to prove how safe Iraq was. The following day, 21 Iraqis were abducted from the market and murdered.</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s attempts to show off his expertise often turn into banana peels. Recently he attacked Barack Obama for saying that in the future, he might send forces back in &#8220;if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq.&#8221; Jeered the Arizona senator, &#8220;Al-Qaida already has a base in Iraq. It&#8217;s called al-Qaida in Iraq.&#8221;</p>
<p>But al-Qaida in Iraq has about as much to do with al-Qaida in Afghanistan as the San Diego Padres have to do with the Catholic Church. It&#8217;s a separate, independent and largely homegrown group that is focused on slaughtering Iraqi Shiites, not targeting American cities. And here&#8217;s a newsflash for McCain: It didn&#8217;t exist until our invasion created conditions favorable to violent insurgency.</p></blockquote>
<p>So much for straight talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDsg</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74450</link>
		<dc:creator>JDsg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74450</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfettered capitalism&quot; = laissez-faire capitalism, capitalism without or with very little regulation.  IMO, China today suffers from many of the ills of unfettered capitalism.  (The Chinese government has various regulations on the books for their businesses, but it&#039;s very obvious from news accounts that these regulations are sporadically enforced at best.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfettered capitalism&#8221; = laissez-faire capitalism, capitalism without or with very little regulation.  IMO, China today suffers from many of the ills of unfettered capitalism.  (The Chinese government has various regulations on the books for their businesses, but it&#8217;s very obvious from news accounts that these regulations are sporadically enforced at best.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KLM</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74438</link>
		<dc:creator>KLM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74438</guid>
		<description>What exactly is &quot;unfettered capitalism&quot;?  Please explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is &#8220;unfettered capitalism&#8221;?  Please explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Omar</title>
		<link>http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-74343</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://austrolabe.com/2008/02/24/the-100-years-of-war-candidate/#comment-74343</guid>
		<description>Another reason why I have such tremendous respect for Rep. Ron Paul: he voted &quot;no&quot; on a congressional resolution condemning the Palestinians for the slaughter that has been inflicted upon them.

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/05/congress-defends-gaza-assault-404-1/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason why I have such tremendous respect for Rep. Ron Paul: he voted &#8220;no&#8221; on a congressional resolution condemning the Palestinians for the slaughter that has been inflicted upon them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/05/congress-defends-gaza-assault-404-1/">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/20.....ult-404-1/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

